I have a lot of information to share about my trip to Audemars Piguet and I’m going to try and keep it interesting and informative since I know not everyone is into watches like I am.
First just a bit of history on how that Swiss valley where AP is located became such a hotspot for all the watchmakers. The Audemars Piguet facilities are located in Vallée de Joux which is considered to be “the heart of Swiss watchmaking”. In the early 1800’s a watchmaker moved into the valley and started producing watches and when his business started booming he needed to hire help. The valley was full of farmers who spent the summers busy outdoors farming but the winters indoor not doing much. So, the farmers got into watchmaking since the basic tools to get started didn’t cost much and even their children started learning and working with watches at a young age. In other parts of Switzerland farmers were making music boxes during the winter months but they were making watches.
Once we arrived to Vallée de Joux which is just over an hour drive from Geneva, we were taken to the AP Restoration Department followed by the Museum. The restoration department is where they work to restore old watches back to working condition while trying to preserve all their original parts. A lot of the watch parts aren’t available anymore so if anything is missing or needs replacing not only do they have to hand make the parts but they always try to remake them using the same technique they were originally made with. While we were there we were lucky that the head of the department was working on a vintage pocket watch that contained a Grand Complication movement dating back to 1899 (pictured above). A simple watch movement is a watch that indicates the hours, minutes and seconds. On the other hand a calendar is a complicated movement, a moon phase, an alarm, a minute repeater (tells time using chimes) are all complicated movements. A Grand Complication is a movement that contains a whole bunch of complicated movements all together in one watch. I’ll try to list everything the watch above does so here it goes: It has clock watch with grand and small strike, minute-repeater, split seconds chronograph with minutes counter, alarm, jumping seconds, flying seconds and perpetual calendar. Yeah that’s a lot of things and this is a watch that was created back in 1899. It’s currently valued at around 3 million Euros.
After leaving the restoration department we headed to the museum. We weren’t allowed to take pictures inside but I did manage to take the one below of a poster that I saw hanging on the wall (I want it). The museum is housed in the original AP building from the late 1800’s. Although it’s full of interesting pieces, this was probably the most boring part of the whole trip for me because I couldn’t wait to get out and head over to their main production facility. If anyone knows where I can find the Ali with Arnold poster please let me know.
22 replies on “Audemars Piguet Museum and Restoration Department”
“I’ll try to list everything the watch above does so here it goes: It has clock watch with grand and small strike, minute-repeater, split seconds chronograph with minutes counter, alarm, jumping seconds, flying seconds and perpetual calendar. Yeah that’s a lot of things and this is a watch that was created back in 1899. It’s currently valued at around 3 million Euros.”
Jaw meets floor.
Mark, what camera did you use for the pictures?
My Panasonic GX1 with either a 20mm f/1.7 lens or the 14-42mm x powered lens.
Nice. How much ISO you used for these indoor shots?
Up to ISO1600 (yeah it’s a good cam)
powered lens?
yeah, when powered off its a pancake lens similar in size to the 20mm f/1.7
https://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic_x_14-42_3p5-5p6
I hope it’s the same kit lens I’m getting with the LX5 I ordered from amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003WJR69E/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i01
not even close. completely different camera, sensor and lens. the LX5 is a point and shoot with a very tiny sensor. the GX1 is a micro 4/3 mirrorless camera with a much larger sensor.
you should have went with this, same price but much better camera
https://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-Four-Thirds-Interchangeable-3-0-Inch-Touch-Screen/dp/B004A8ZQJS
What is the essential difference between the two?
The GF2 link I gave you is a camera similar to mine, large sensor and interchangeable lenses
Between the Lumix you want and my GX1 or GF2 there is a huge difference in image quality, iso noise plus more importantly a lens like the 20mm f/1.7 would allow you to shoot in darker conditions and also allow you to get very shallow depth of field.
Meaning the LX5 & GF2. The latter is discontinued.
I know the GF2 is discontinued but its still much better than the LX5. All the advantages of my GX1 applies to the GF2. The LX5 can’t compete with any micro 4/3 camera.
Sorry for this thread going OT, but I already have the D90 and all I wanted was a pretty good, small, point and shoot I can fit in my pocket with manual control and a good zoom lens. I thought about the GX1, but its not exactly a pocket camera is it? I considered other models from Sony and Fuji, but they all had issues for my daily use, either too big or sensor problems. The LX5 was the best compromise available. The GF2 is discontinued, so I won’t buy it unless it’s heavily discounted and it isn’t.
Thanks for the information. It gives me impetus to think about my next camera. 🙂
The GF2 is newer than the LX5. Also you could check out the GF3.
Right now the GF2 is the same price as the LX5 but offers a vast improvement in quality, features and abilities.
The GF2 photos are nearly as good as your D90. The LX5 is going to be competing with your mobile phone not DSLR.
What do you think of the Fujifilm X10? I like the retro look, but the sensor has problems.
It’s a camera i’ve recommended to a friend before, it’s got a sensor larger than a standar point and shoot but the GF2 still has a larger sensor (better image, iso and shallow depth of field) and interchangeable lenses.
Finally, look at these pictures. You can’t really ask for more than this from a lowly point & shoot.
https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/albums/panasonic-dmc-lx5-preview-samples/slideshow
Finally, look at these pictures on the bottom of this page. you can’t really ask for more than this from a lowly point & shoot
https://www.apple.com/iphone/built-in-apps/camera.html
u asked for my opinion i gave it to u. The LX5 is not as good as the X10, GF1, GF2, GF3 or GX1.
Your opinion is highly appreciated.