Dancing at Virgin

She probably has attention whoreitus syndrome.

“Woe is me, I can’t refrain from dancing when I listen to music, especially in public.” (rolleyes).

If that was in the US it would make a headline on the Insider !

“If that was in the US it would make a headline on the Insider !”

It wouldn’t, and no one would care at all. But obviously we have different standards of morality here in Kuwait, and people who live here should respect that.

PS: I do realize that it was a sarcastic post.

Monotheist i’m sure we’re not VEGAS :)) ,but don’t u think posting this is sick !!!!

I wouldn’t be surprised if the close minded Kuwaiti govt. shutdown virgin again because of this girl

good dancer

Drunk n Gorgeous: My thoughts exactly!! If she’s wearing something that men here “think” is revealing .. she deserves being photographed.. if she dances a little .. laughs.. smokes.. then the whole world should see it!! and how sick is this place when young men have no respect for the law and for others? nowhere else in the world would anyone talk to a security guard that way..

I don’t understand when Kuwait became like this? obsessed with voyeurism.

Thats not dancing .. she is having a seizure.

ohh btw..in ma above comment, please read it as..

IN MA OPINION – this REALLY cant be considered INVASION OF PRIVACY or anythin along those lines.

(its an opinion.. it might or might not be correct from a technical or a legal point of view. the beauty of legal systems (all over) is NOT what makes logical sense or What is true.. BUT .. what can be proved)

Just goes to show what a sad shit hole Kuwait has become when everyone gets a boner and circle jerks in Virgin when a chick dances.

Losers.

“Monotheist i’m sure we’re not VEGAS :)) ,but don’t u think posting this is sick !!!!” -Shady

I don’t really know what the guy behind the camera’s intentions were, but at least he exposed some of the crap that goes on in many public places in Kuwait. It’s not like anyone could identify the girl from watching the video, and I don’t think she’d mind anyway. People who dance like that in public tend not to.

Monotheist i have to agree with u ,fair enough :)),and about the security guards don’t know much about that here,but they are weak any where they can’t do anything specially the ones in malls what do u expect them to do?
have a nice day ppl and lets find something more interesting to talk about 🙂

“You didn’t know. Dancing is Haram! It makes people want to do naughty things.” -anon

That’s true actually. Ask any honest man and he’ll tell you straight up. Any man who denies that is lying or is a homosexual. Why do people even deny this?

Monotheist, thanks for bullet pointing all the reasons Kuwait is a shit hole.

And for your info, most of Kuwait aint conservative, most of Kuwait is Kids (70%)…yeh the ones who go around the trying to pick up chicks in malls, restaurants and driving like sexually repressed monkeys on the streets.

Grow some nuts dude. This is 2007 not 1897. No one wants your backward shit imposed on us anymore.

I wonder what song she was listening to? Akeed something “Shar8i” LOOL

I find it , cant understand all the fuss about it …but in general i dont condone with the video taping in public or private without consent….

Mono,

So when you dance with your daughter at her wedding, would you get an urge to “do things” to her? Be more specific, You meant provocative dancing, right?

And, be honest, the average male, wants to “do things” to the opposite sex irregardless of the involvement of dancing. To bring religion into it is absurd. The behavior is just trashy and low class on part of teh girl, who most likely is full of hormones herself.

I’d be ashamed if it was my daughter acting like this in public, but I wouldn’t drag religion into it. The poor girl had inadequete home training.

But answer me this, why do supposededly pious people put themselves in a position to be offended by watching this sort of nonsense? It’s as if they go out of there way to be offended and have some perverse need to monitor and control other peoples beliefs and behaviors. But when there own behavor or belief is question the offense meter pings off the chart.

“Monotheist, thanks for bullet pointing all the reasons Kuwait is a shit hole.

And for your info, most of Kuwait aint conservative, most of Kuwait is Kids (70%)…yeh the ones who go around the trying to pick up chicks in malls, restaurants and driving like sexually repressed monkeys on the streets.

Grow some nuts dude. This is 2007 not 1897. No one wants your backward shit imposed on us anymore.” – toni

So let me get this straight. A population that consists of 70% young adults equates to a non-conservative population? What kind of logic is that? You made an unsubstantiated assumption when you claimed that “kid” = non-conservative. In reality, the Kuwaiti youth have different political and social orientations. In your experience, perhaps you found that most of the ones you came into contact with are just like you described, but that all depends on where you’re looking. Obviously the people you’re going to find at malls will be different than the ones you find in a mosque. In my experience, there are also plenty of conservative “kids”. Take a look at Kuwait university. If the pattern of voting we’ve seen throughout the years is any indication, it means that the student body consists of a majority of conservatives.

And no one is imposing any “shit” on you. This “shit” is the status quo, it’s what the majority wants. You’d think that’s obvious enough for everyone to see.

Reply to sfsa78

“Mono.. Are you still copying and pasting peoples comments, annoying the heck out of them with your Islamo-fascism comments.”

I’m copying and pasting the comments to give my replys a message board format. It’s more convenient since I can break up my reply into specific parts addressed to specific quotes, just like I’m about to do now.

Since you called me an islamofascist, you should point out what exactly you found particularly fascist about my replies. Do you even know what a fascist is, or do we just like to use buzzwords?

“You have to understand, you can’t force people to choose your idiologies. It’s a free country, we don’t live in Mecca, S.Arabia. It a democracy, wether you like it or not.”

Yes, and that’s exactly what I’m saying. I’m saying you can’t force people to accept public indecent behaviour just like it’s acceptable in western countries. The fact that Kuwait is a democracy is exactly why you shouldn’t.

“Ever heard of freedom of religion? Isn’t that in the Kuwaiti constitution, or are you blind to the freedoms in it, and only want people to conform into your sharia point of view.”

That’s nice, but where in my reply did I even say anything about banning other religions? Are you just posting random thoughts?

“The world has witness what political Islam can do. It’s not pretty. the victims are not people in foreign lands, no, the victims are the muslims.”

Even though this has absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic at hand, I’ll make a quick comment.

The last time political Islam was correctly implemented was with the last caliphate. Not Saudi Arabia, not Afghanistan, not any country that currently exists.

“Go see sharia law in its intirety in Afghanistan while the Talibans where in control.”

See above comment. Then consider the opposite cases of successful Islamic states throughout history. Moorish Spain (Al-Andalus) would be a good start.

“If the Government in kuwait where to be made up of theese kinds of people, what guarantee do we have that we want turn into the same as Afghanistan, or Saudi Arabia, where religious people will rule, and even you, Monotheist, will be a conservative muslim when compared to these people, will realise that its too late.”

Why not expect it to turn out to be like the prophet’s State in Medina or Mecca 1400 years ago, peace and blessings be upon him? Why not expect it to turn out to be like Al-Andalus? Because you’re selectively looking at the dark side and completely neglecting the bright side.

Now that’s we’ve briefly digressed towards irrelevant issues, let’s try to stick to the topic, okay?

“Kuwaits population is a diverse population, with many religions, and faiths, and beliefs. A population that that is ever more aware of the rest of the world, and the dangers of extremes in any religion.”

Again with the religious plurality. Nowhere in my reply have I said anything about banning other religions. And what’s so extreme about anything I said? Just buzzwords again or do your labels have any substance to them?

Reply to sfsa78

“Comment number 26 is proof that Monotheist is an Islamo-fascist.”

Okay, now that you’ve demonstrated that you have no idea what fascism is all about, you should read this before you embarrass yourself even further: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

I think the word you actually meant to label me with is “Homophobe,” even though it doesn’t apply to me (nor does my reply suggest it in any way).

As much as i dont approve of homosexualism, i find mono..’s comment rather offensive:

“That’s true actually. Ask any honest man and he’ll tell you straight up. Any man who denies that is lying or is a homosexual. Why do people even deny this?”

Then go ahead and explain what’s so offensive about it, I’d love to see this. Unless you think that the factual statement that homosexuals aren’t attracted to women, you pretty much have nothing to work with.

“Monotheist, people like you are dangerous. What other extreme idiologies do you subscribe to?”

I subscribe to the ideology of rationality and common sense, which apparently isn’t too common these days.

انت يا الفلسطيني ليت مي قو .. ما عندك ديرة تحررها بالأول بعدين تعال ضرط على خلق الله .. شنو يعني صاير قوي تدقر بالأوادم ؟؟

Mono.. it seems no one here subscribes to your extreme and distorted idiologies.

FROM WIKIPEDIA:
Islamofascism is a controversial neologism suggesting an association of the ideological or operational characteristics of certain modern Islamist movements with European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism. Organizations and doctrines which have been labeled “Islamofascist” include Wahhabism[1], Hamas[2][3] Al-Qaeda (and its supporters such as the Salafi Group for Preaching and Combat, JI in Indonesia, etc.) and the current Iranian government[4].

Some commentators see Islamofascism as a movement defined by Islamists who seek both a return to Sharia law and the violent creation of a new unified Muslim state. This is often conceived by Sunni Islamists as a new Caliphate spanning the former Islamic empire, from Spain to Central Asia [2][3][4] [5][6], or by radical Shi’a Islamists as a worldwide Islamic state led by a leading Islamic jurist. [7] [8] A few scholars have cautiously used the term fascism to discuss certain forms of militant Islamic fundamentalism, or militant Islam. (See Neofascism and religion.) Groups labeled “Islamofascist” are not uniform in doctrine and some, for example Wahhabi [5] and Shia [6]groups, can be deeply antagonistic to each other. [9] Sheikh Abdel-Rahman al-Barrak fatwa on Shia
The most famous linkage between historical Fascism and modern Islamofascism is made through the World War II-era Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini, who was hosted in Nazi Germany after being forced to flee Palestine and, later, Iraq by British authorities.
One primary common attribute of Nazism and modern ascriptions of Islamofascism are that both display extreme Antisemitism. The extent of antisemitism in other European fascist movements varied; it was not significant in Italy until 1938 [10]. Provocation by modern Islamists of Holocaust denial[12] strengthens the comparison between Islamists and neo-Nazi movements. Two of the most influential Islamists of the twentieth century, Ayatollah Khomeini and Sayyid Qutb, asserted repeatedly in their writings that foreigners, especially Jews, were conspiring to destroy Islam and persecute the Muslim community.[11][12]

Weren’t the spaniards forced into islam by the moores?? whats perfect about that?
about taking other peoples lands and forcing people to convert by violence. Is this the common sence that you are so proud of? Islam being spread by the sword?

Yet clearly, one of the reasons for the growth of Islam over the past century has been that becoming a Muslim is a one-way street. Whether by birth or conversion (historically likely to have been a forced conversion) once you are a Muslim the only way out, under the Sharia, is death.

When Political Islam really does advocate jihad to achieve world domination, then anyone deeply concerned with humanity and human rights will be critical. Of all the existing ideologies, Political Islam remains the greatest danger to humanity. Political Islam has been neither tamed nor moderated by progressive forces. It has the power to inspire the terrorist mind, and, through its ties to oil-rich states, the funds to pursue its plans.

Reply to sfsa78:

-Good job addressing the points I raised. Excellent debating skills.

-I know what is meant by Islamofascism, and I think it’s pseudointellectual garbage. You used the term, you obviously agree with it, and you should now point out whatever it is in my replies that you found screaming with fascism. I’m still waiting.

-When quoting wikipedia, just post the link instead of the entire article.

-Yes, Hitler killed Jews and homosexuals. What exactly does that have to do with anything I said? Random thoughts should be jotted down in your diary, not on someone else’s blog.

-The Spaniards weren’t forced into Islam. Their land was conquered (just like every other piece of land was conquered sometime at some point in the past), but no one forced them to embrace Islam. This is because :
1) The Qur’an says: [“Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects Taghut (evil) and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trust worthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things. ” (Qur’an 2:256)

2) You can’t really force anyone to accept any religion. You can scare them into pretending to be observant, but you can’t force them to change their inner beliefs.

-Stay on topic, son. Aside from name calling, buzzword/fancy labeling, posting random articles, and incoherent sentences, you still haven’t replied to a single point I raised. If this was an attempt at having the last word on your part, then by all means save face.

“To me there seems to be an element of extremism that clearly came through in your insesant, condesending writting, not just to me, but by others on this blog.”

Well if it stands out clearly, as you say, then it should be easy enough for you to point it out. You still haven’t done that. And I’m sure other people can speak for themselves if they have a problem with anything I’m saying, as some already have.

“I doubt that i’m the only one here on the blog that finds you extremely offensive at times.”

Ironically, I haven’t engaged in childish name calling with anyone I disagreed with on this page, while all but one of them called me names and cussed me out. That says a lot about who’s being offensive. All I did was state my opinion.

“If you dont like being confronted, i suggest you move on.”

In case you haven’t noticed, I’m the one doing all the confronting here. You just post random articles and cuss.

“If you expect me or any other normal minded person here on the blog to waste their time reading your ‘hundred word essay’ blogs every time, argueing, or should i say, entertaining your extremist views, you are very much mistaken my friend.”

Apparently that’s not the case with you since you replied this much thus far.

“I will still label you as a Islamofascist, or if you like extremist. I think you’ve earned it.”

Anyone can call anyone anything. The problem is when people can’t make sense of it. For example, I can call you an islamophobe since you appear to be vehemently to anything remotely Islamic, promptly labeling the average Muslim an Islamofascist or an extremist. Can you do the same when you call me an Islamofascist or an extremist? Obviously not.

“:) Thank you.”

Haha, it’s too late to pull out the polite card now. You’ve already called me a “twat” among other things, remember? Be consistent.

oh and i dont think she is a part of the kuwaiti community (local or expat)

cause i aint neva’ seen a girl who can shake ha’ booty like dat @@

Sad wankers. Just cause a chick has a dance, it spews out 55 comments. Just shows what a long way we still have to go.

You got one extremist talkin about religion after watchin a dance? Feck, hope that daft wanker never leaves kuwait, he might have a seizure.

Guys, respect each other’s opinion…and please stop this stupid immature, name-calling!!!

The chick was neither naked nor was she gyrating against some guy. So she busted out some dance moves, big deal? If this somehow offends your sense of decency, then just, do not look. Simple as that.

That said, girl got some skills, yo! 🙂

I think its funny how everyone is discussing the fact that shes dancing at all or that the guy was taping when in reality the odd thing about this video is the WAY she was dancing. Shuffling around and kinda bouncing to the music is normal no matter where you are, but full out bellydancer moves in a record store ANYWHERE is pretty extreme.

In these cases the simplest answer is usually the correct answer. Maybe she had a little crush on the video taper and wanted to get his attention… or maybe she was on drugs? Either one (or both).

:p

*Video Judgment*

1. She has some nice moves (the whole package too)

2. Kuwait needs dancing club.

3. I wonder what music she was listening too?

4. The security guy is a complete deuchebag.

5. Can’t believe the Virgin employers didn’t do nothing or to even at least tell her to stop what she was doing. ( But I can’t blame them, our male hormones in Kuwait are uncontrollable).

6. The power of the Bluetooth is simply amazing.